Reliability-first retrieval

Right context for AI.

Minimize context loss. Answers backed by citations.

Datester builds retrieval infrastructure for AI systems, starting with transcripts. We preserve context integrity, reduce context loss across chunking and retrieval, and return citation-backed evidence so models can answer grounded in source material.

Right context for AI. Minimize context loss. Verifiable answers with citations.

Citations-first Responses prioritize verifiable source references over unsupported synthesis.
Context integrity Segmentation preserves meaning across boundaries, reducing context breakage.
Auditable by design Evidence trails are inspectable, making reviews and governance practical.

Why retrieval fails today

Most LLM failures are not model failures, they are context failures. Chunking and retrieval pipelines often discard relationships that carry meaning, which leads to ungrounded answers.

  • Naive chunking splits key statements from their qualifiers, owners, or timestamps.
  • Retrieval returns partially relevant text windows that miss the decisive context.
  • The model fills gaps with plausible language, not necessarily evidence from source material.
  • Teams lose trust because they cannot trace outputs back to auditable references.

Reliability-first retrieval for grounded AI answers

Datester is built around context quality, evidence quality, and output traceability. The result is tighter context windows and citation-backed responses teams can verify.

Context-preserving segmentation

Segmenting transcripts with boundary awareness so key meaning and dependencies remain intact.

Evidence-first retrieval

Ranking for evidentiary value, not just lexical overlap, to prioritize trustworthy context.

Citation-backed responses

Answer payloads include source anchors so reviewers can inspect exactly why a claim appears.

Minimal context waste

Tighter, relevant context windows reduce token waste while preserving reasoning-critical details.

How it works

A practical retrieval pipeline designed for traceability from ingestion to final answer.

Ingest → Normalize → Segment → Index → Retrieve → Answer with citations

  1. Ingest + NormalizeCollect transcript inputs and standardize structure, speakers, and timestamps.
  2. SegmentCreate context-preserving chunks that retain semantic dependencies.
  3. IndexStore enriched segments with metadata needed for precise retrieval.
  4. RetrieveAssemble tight evidence windows with strong relevance and minimal context waste.
  5. Answer with citationsReturn grounded outputs linked to the exact source evidence used.
Datester evidence chain diagram Documents and transcripts flow through segmentation and retrieval into an answer that cites source references. Source material Meeting transcript A Consulting notes B Policy document C Context windows Boundary-aware segmentation Evidence-first ranking Window 1: decision + owner + timestamp Window 2: rationale + constraints Answer output Grounded summary Citations: A[12:04], A[12:15] B[03:42], C[Policy-7]

Evidence chain: source text remains visible and reviewable all the way to the generated answer.

Trust and reliability, built into the pipeline

Datester helps teams move from opaque outputs to accountable retrieval and answer generation.

Grounded by default

Grounded responses over unsupported fluency

Prompt contexts are selected for evidence quality so outputs are tied to source material, not just likely phrasing.

Auditable evidence trail

Traceable from answer back to source

Teams can inspect citation anchors and evaluate whether each answer is justified by the retrieved evidence.

Risk-aware design

Reduces hallucination risk

By improving context integrity and retrieval precision, Datester lowers the chance of unsupported claims.

Use cases

Built for teams that need actionable answers tied to evidence.

Consulting

Consulting notes → action items

Convert dense discussion notes into next steps linked to the exact source rationale and owners.

Meetings

Meeting transcripts → decisions + follow-ups

Extract decisions, blockers, and commitments with references teams can quickly verify.

Internal knowledge

Internal docs → policy Q&A with citations

Enable staff to ask policy questions and see exactly which document sections support each answer.

Roadmap

Current focus is transcripts, with broader retrieval coverage and controls in progress.

  • Now
    Transcripts reliability layer Context-preserving segmentation and citation-backed answer flows for transcript-heavy workflows.
  • Next
    PDF and document support Expand ingestion and retrieval quality controls across mixed document formats.
  • Soon
    Evaluation harness Repeatable tests for context integrity, evidence coverage, and citation quality.
  • Later
    Enterprise controls Policy controls, audit workflows, and reliability instrumentation for production deployments.

Request early access

Tell us your workflow and we will follow up with fit, timeline, and onboarding details.

Submitting opens your default email client with a prefilled request to founder@datester.in.